On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 10:09 -0800, Kirk Bocek wrote: > On 11/15/2010 9:52 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: > > On 11/15/2010 9:43 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: > >> Just updated to the current 23.1-241 packages on Centos 5 x86_64. On my > >> sole > >> slave backend, mythbackend segfaults when started:
> Okay, got it. My update pulled in the bijou versions of the libraries:
OK, before I read the resolution I prepared a small diagnosis line for
determining what you pulled in last from ATrpms. Since the builddate is
usually just 0-3 days apart from the push date this gives you the order
of packages coming in:
rpm -qa --qf '%{buildtime} %{vendor} %{buildtime:date}
%{name}-%{version}-%{release}\n' \
| grep ATrpms.net | sort -nr | sed -e's,.* ATrpms.net,,' | head -n 30
Just posting it anyways because it's a nice check.
> I removed the bijou versions with "rpm -e --nodeps" then ran:
>
> yum install libmyth\* --enablerepo=atrpms --exclude=\*bijou\*
>
> Mythbackend is running now. Interesting that mythfrontend ran fine with the
> bijou libraries but mythbackend didn't.
It depends on the ABI changes that probably affect the backend and not
the frontend.
yum install libmyth\* is probably not enough. You have packages that do
not start with libmyth, or that do not start with myth, so you may miss
packages again and have a similar mixed version setup.
Why not simply yum update --exclude=\*bijou\*? Or even better, why not
use bijou? There are many bijou users out there enjoying the extra bits
in it.
--
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
