On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 07:48 -0800, JD wrote: > On 11/18/2010 08:28 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 19:35 -0800, JD wrote: > > > I think I am having a problem with the macros being used in > > > spec files from atrpm src packages. > > > > > > Could someone point to e where Ican download most recent > > > macro definitions ? > > atrpms-rpm-config has the most recent macros used, just > Well, I already have it, but builds are failing > due to macro problems.
> I tried to build x264-snapshot-20101001-2245
> It failed because it could not find a translation
> for x264gtk
> So, I removed --with gtk from the rpmbuild command,
The default is w/o gtk, you shouldn't need do change anything. Also the
line in the specfile is
%{?with_gtk:--enable-gtk} \
not --with-gtk, I wonder whether you are using the specfile from ATrpms
or something else (?).
> and now it fails some script which is stuck in an infinite loop
> belching out
An infinite loop doesn't belch out. ;)
> /usr/lib/rpm/atrpms/find-lib.sh: error: No /lib
> %{__lib_package_list}.so. found in build!
I wonder how this can happen, for the above line to trigger you need to
have lib_package which then sets __lib_package_list. Perhaps the changes
you made to either specfile or the macros are bogus.
> So, clearly the damned macros are at fault here.
Well, it's neither "damned", nor "clearly" IMNSHO, and insulting
someone's work isn't helping in finding what your issues are. The macros
have proven to work well for over half a decade w/ minimal changes if
any.
--
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
