Thanks for reporting, RHEL4 doesn't like the --uid option, but -u does
the same.

The upcoming update to 2.2.2 has this fixed. Please give it a try
later today or tomorrow.

On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 05:34:56PM +0300, Jacques Goldberg wrote:
> <html style="direction: ltr;">
>   <head>
> 
>     <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
>     <style type="text/css">body p { margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt; } 
> </style>
>   </head>
>   <body style="direction: ltr;"
>     bidimailui-detected-decoding-type="latin-charset" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"
>     text="#000000">
>     Dear Sir,<br>
>     <br>
>     There is a tiny bug in dovecot-2.2.1-4_135.el4.i386.rpm and earlier
>     which looks pretty much to be just a typo :<br>
>     <br>
>     [root@phep2 config]# rpm -Uvh dovecot-2.2.1-4_135.el4.i386.rpm <br>
>     warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature<br>
>     warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature<br>
>     warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature<br>
>     
> Preparing...&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
>     ########################################### [100%]<br>
>     useradd: invalid option -- -<br>
>     usage: useradd&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [-u uid [-o]] [-g group] [-G group,...] 
> <br>
>     &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [-d home] [-s shell] [-c comment] 
> [-m [-k template]]<br>
>     &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [-f inactive] [-e expire ] [-p 
> passwd] [-M] [-n] [-r] [-l]
>     name<br>
>     &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; useradd&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -D [-g 
> group] [-b base] [-s shell]<br>
>     &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [-f inactive] [-e expire ]<br>
>     error: %pre(dovecot-2.2.1-4_135.el4.i386) scriptlet failed, exit
>     status 1<br>
>     error:&nbsp;&nbsp; install: %pre scriptlet failed (2), skipping
>     dovecot-2.2.1-4_135.el4<br>
>     <br>
>     Could you please either fix it or instruct me how to?<br>
>     In the latter case can it be done and how by extracting the file to
>     be corrected rom the binary rpm or should I use the src a nd
>     recompile?<br>
>     <br>
>     Thanks<br>
>     Jacques<br>
>     <br>
>   </body>
> </html>
> 

-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Reply via email to