Yes, but that is not modular. What if I need the inputs later ? Then I'll have to copy them. Consuming the inputs is also a bit confusing.
пятница, 20 октября 2017 г., 17:21:27 UTC+3 пользователь Steinway Wu написал: > > I guess you can define \cross and * as functions that consume the linear > lists and return a new one? > > On Friday, October 20, 2017 at 10:11:00 AM UTC-4, Russoul wrote: >> >> Let's treat `list_vt(a,n)` as algebraic vector of dim 'n'. Then let's >> perform some operations on a bunch of them: >> >> (*pseudocode*) >> ... >> val a = $list_vt(1,0,0) >> val b = $list_vt(0,1,0) >> val c = a \cross b >> val d = c * PI >> ... >> val _ = free a >> val _ = free b >> val _ = free c >> val _ = free d >> (*end of code fragment*) >> >> Cleaning(freeing) after simple algebraic operations in the above example >> is tedious. And I suppose it can become a real pain in math extensive code. >> What is the way out ? >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ats-lang-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ats-lang-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/859ccbb6-1a42-4404-81af-25f3a4ce4f37%40googlegroups.com.
