Is there a reason that both 'size_t' and 'ssize_t' exist? For example, functions in 'string.sats' all take or return 'size_t a' while 'strptr.sats' uses 'ssize_t a'. I see they're defined differently in 'integer_size.sats' but since they're both indexed similarly I'm unclear as to why the ATS prelude functions aren't standardized on one of them. Thanks!
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ats-lang-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ats-lang-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to ats-lang-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ats-lang-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/4f527316-b56f-4595-bcef-ec3059bed3e3%40googlegroups.com.
