Hi, If a put a template function invocation inside a closure function, it seems that the template is resolved at the closure definition time. I know one way to work around this is to use templates all the way, and replace closures with something like `foobar$fwork`. But is there another way of doing so while keeping the closures? Is there something like an anonymous template and corresponding type for it?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ats-lang-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ats-lang-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/97235e35-5712-4528-be37-d12fca30d1b6%40googlegroups.com.
