That would greatly complicate the semantics of ATS. On Sunday, May 6, 2018 at 3:05:45 PM UTC-4, Steinway Wu wrote: > > I was playing with a utility library based on type classes, implemented as > templates. As you mentioned, I experienced "interface explosion". For > things like a fold, or a fmap, I have a t@ype version that is probably > garbage collected, a vt@ype version that is call-by-value, and a vt@ype > version that consumes the resources which seems to be the only possible > version for lazy linear types. Is it theoretically possible to introduce > some way of doing sort scheme? So one doesn't need to specify any specific > base sorts? > > On Sunday, May 6, 2018 at 2:16:28 PM UTC-4, gmhwxi wrote: >> >> Yes. Should probably use some more informative syntax in ATS3. >> >> >> >>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ats-lang-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ats-lang-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to ats-lang-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ats-lang-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/a8912151-d103-452b-836b-aa1addef268d%40googlegroups.com.
