I see. I missed it. Then differentiating an uninitialized vector from an initialized one is now a problem.
On Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 6:44:24 PM UTC-5, Mark Thom wrote: > > I see your point about the alignment, I think, but why is the vector_v(a?, > l, n) necessary? The at-view (a? @ l) is already part of the vector_v > definition. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ats-lang-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ats-lang-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/b93c9280-ec27-4e5a-bf8a-16da93f3b245%40googlegroups.com.
