Am I right in thinking that the difference between a let/where and local is
that the latter allows sharing scope across multiple declarations whereas
the former only allows one?
For example if I wanted local bindings for some 'val a' I could do:
val a = ... where { ... some bindings ... }
or:
local
... some bindings ...
in
val a = ...
end
but if I wanted share a local scope between 'val a' and 'val b' I'd have to
do:
l
ocal
...
in
val a = ...
val b = ...
end
since there is no way to do that with 'let' or 'where'.
Is it correct that this is the only difference?
Thanks!
-deech
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ats-lang-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ats-lang-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/f0ddb692-7b08-4019-868d-cdf697994bf5%40googlegroups.com.
