Yes, I think so. Should be pretty straightforward. Of course, you need to be more specific about the actual policy. For example, the policy may state that multiple readers can read concurrently but at most one writer can write.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 7:52 PM Raoul Duke <rao...@gmail.com> wrote: > apologies, i couldn’t find this / figure this out from some basic web > search results. > > is it possible to do statically enforced max N readers, max M writers? eg > the classic “prevent reading from a closed file” only supports a single > open-close. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ats-lang-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ats-lang-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/CAJ7XQb5VKuhbR386TdO-nKWtf9cgsoAZrRwyu491j1ESvm0kfQ%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/CAJ7XQb5VKuhbR386TdO-nKWtf9cgsoAZrRwyu491j1ESvm0kfQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ats-lang-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ats-lang-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/CAPPSPLqsQXh6kFyq7WqUK_chNwN7e%2ByF%2BMqu6CV2SeGPuPCsTg%40mail.gmail.com.
