Your question got me thinking :)

I feel that ATS3 is not yet suitable right now.

I am focusing on implementing a typechecker for linear and dependent types.
After that, I suppose I can polish it a bit and then make a release.

--Hongwei



On Monday, March 1, 2021 at 9:11:13 PM UTC-5 d4v3y_5c0n3s wrote:

> Thank you for the suggestions.  I decided to sidestep my need to _ for 
> now.  While atscntrb-hx-libpcre seems like it would suit my needs, I'd 
> rather not require people to install too many external libraries.  Is ATS3 
> suitable for writing libraries for currently?  Because if I were to 
> implement string processing functions it would make the most since to do it 
> for ATS3.
>
> On Sunday, February 28, 2021 at 11:35:29 AM UTC-5 gmhwxi wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the link. I will take a look.
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 6:04:13 PM UTC-5 Elronnd _ wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021, gmhwxi wrote: 
>>> > As for building an ecosystem for ATS3, I am thinking about a way for 
>>> > contributed packages to be hosted on-line. Not much progress is made 
>>> at 
>>> > this stage, though. 
>>>
>>> Have you seen 
>>> https://github.com/vmchale/atspkg/blob/master/ats-pkg/README.md ? 
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ats-lang-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ats-lang-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/d5f5c0d2-13ff-42d9-8d12-0241ad93ef33n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to