Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, May 11 2005, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] >>> Nice. I used TAGs like 20050511-a which doesn't work as it is. Do >>> you see any problem with this modification of the sed expression? >>> - '/^[-0-9]*$$/s//-D &/' >>> + '/^\([0-9]*\)[-a-z]*$$/s//-D \1/' >> >> Well, it will stop the TAG=`date --iso` stuff from working, but as >> long as we are the only people thinking up TAG names, this should not >> matter too much. What is the rationale behind it? > > To allow appending "-a"..."-z" like in 20050511-a.
I can read regular expressions, thank you, even if you had not explicitly spelled out the kind of TAG, anyway. What is the rationale behind appending "-a"..."-z" like in 20050511-a? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
