Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, May 12 2005, David Kastrup wrote: > >> This only makes sense if no xemacs-sumo or similar package already >> leaves us with an AUCTeX version in /usr/share/xemacs/xemacs-packages. >> If it does, we would probably need to go to >> /usr/share/xemacs/site-packages instead to avoid conflicts, like we do >> on RedHat. >> >> Any word on that from SuSE users? Reiner? Where do the various SuSE >> packages for XEmacs place their AUCTeX? > > SuSE ships AUCTeX within the (base) xemacs and xemacs-info packages > (probably this more or less corresponds to Sumo).
Ok, this means we should go for site-packages, as expected. The old stuff in the spec file was a take-over from preview-latex where the choice had been different. Thanks. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
