David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Christian Schlauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ I wondered why cygwin is called `slow'. ] > The tools _are_ quite slower, and yes, that makes them look bad. > Complain to Cygwin, but given all the emulation layers they use, it is > unlikely that this will change. That is _very_ noticeable when you > are using Cygwin Emacs/XEmacs as compared to the native compilations. Okay, I see. I use a native Emacs from ftp.gnu.org and only command-line tools from Cygwin (and those usually just for `small things'). Thanks for the explanation. >> I (and probably the first-time AUCTeX user, too) don't understand >> what `slower' means. `Larger' means that the download will take >> longer, so that is something I understand. But slower? > > Benchmark and compare to MSYS. Ah, I believe you and skip that ;-) -- Christian Schlauer _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
