Evil Boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Evil Boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Will respond to the rest later, but for now, I seem to have >> autoconf 2.54. Is that too old? > > I looked around and apparently I already has 2.59b installed, but > not in my path. I tried it with that and the installation went > through ok. Or at least the previous set of trouble went away. I > tried it on a freshly checked-out installation, but perhaps after > some changes have been made by David&Co. > > Do you want me to make any tests with the older autoconf?
Well, the AS_HELP_STRING stuff was the only problem you reported for the last build, and that has been fixed. I don't know of any other problem, it would appear that your source for autoconf can also provide something newer, and we don't demand a specific version of autoconf in our installation instructions, but just say "recent". I don't think that at the current point of time there is much more information we'd might want to gather in that respect. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
