Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * David Kastrup (2005-06-11) writes: > >> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> I'd like to avoid separate *.preview files completely. That means the >>> files should contain information for both AUCTeX and preview-latex in >>> the source distribution and in binary distributions containing >>> preview-latex. In binary distributions lacking preview-latex the >>> respective information should be omitted from those files. >> >> So what do you suggest? Do an sed job when creating the binary >> distributions, cutting out the preview-latex parts at installation >> time? > > How do you create binary distributions? With the `tar-ball' target? > In that case we could pass a switch to the autogen.sh script which > inhibits the inclusion of the preview-latex-related documentation.
No. Prospective binary targets would be an XEmacs package (built outside of any XEmacs tree) including the docs, and/or a binary RPM file or a Debian package or whatever. Hmmm. Come to think of it, in all of those cases I am not interested in actually providing a no-preview package from the AUCTeX ftp server. Perhaps we should let this be the worry of whoever wants to build something without preview. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
