* David Kastrup (2005-06-13) writes: > Well, I am asking for input in order to figure out the best solution. > My proposal sounds sensible to me, but I am not sure I've considered > every aspect.
Reconsidering (and rereading what your wrote about autogen.sh) I don't see a problem with maintenance either. Keeping such few lines of code in synch between autogen.sh and Makefile.in is probly not a big deal. Regarding other aspects: Can it happen that people have to regenerate configure before they can run it to produce Makefiles? Maybe in case they hacked configure and thereby made it inoperable. But then they could use the original file from the tarball. I currently cannot think of other occasions where regenerating configure without Makefile would be necessary. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
