Hi, I'd appreciate if somebody would take a look at the following:
We have an install-contrib target for bib-cite.el and tex-jp.el, and the undocumented tex-fptex.el (as opposed to tex-mik.el). That's pretty much inconsistent. I think we should include everything in a normal installation (yes, this also means tex-mik.el and tex-fptex.el on a Unix-type installation currently), and the "contrib" distinction does not seem to make sense to me. I think I'd also want to include tex-jp.el even on non-MULE XEmacs installations where tex-jp.elc can't be generated. I am not conclusive about what documentation to include in the packages. After Ralf has rearranged the doc directory, recompiling the texi sources is trivial even without Makefile. Should people be able to compile a printable manual? Or should we just include the info file? How about the plain text stuff? People in the States will need to have reference sheet and so compiled with a different paper size if we include any PS or PDF. So maybe just include the sources? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
