* Reiner Steib (2005-10-06) writes: > On Sun, Oct 02 2005, Ralf Angeli wrote: > >> * Reiner Steib (2005-09-28) writes: >> >>> The disadvantage of this is that the docs (see "grep -nH -e auctex.el >>> doc/*.texi") refer to `auctex.el'. >> >> If this is the only problem I think we can keep it the way it is. > > Would it do any harm if we install it under the original name > `auctex.el' and `suse-start-auctex.el'?
Then `auctex.el' wouldn't have any function, right? I'd find that confusing. > I'd suggest to re-include the spec file in the `tar-ball' Makefile > target. Maybe we should move the RPM generation from `full-release' > to a separate target? Fine with me. In my opinion `full-release' doesn't even have to depend on or call this target respectively. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
