Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> * Arne Jørgensen (2005-10-11) writes:
>
>> Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I think we should provide an option to get the current behavior back.
>>> Things like these might be in the finger-memory of users. 
>>
>> I've made a variable `LaTeX-usepackage-intelligent-behavior-p' that
>> will give the old behavior if set to nil.
>
> In my opinion this is unnecessary.  If we think the new behavior is
> favorable let's just do that and don't look back to the old one which
> I always found awkward.

Agreed.  Alone because of the ugliness of the option name.
"intelligent" is not descriptive.

>
>> +  (if (null LaTeX-usepackage-intelligent-behaviour-p)

> That should be `not' instead of `null' for clarity.

For clarity, it should be

  (unless LaTeX-usepackage-intelligent-behaviour-p

but I don't the the old behavior warrants keeping.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum


_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel

Reply via email to