On Thu, Oct 20 2005, David Kastrup wrote:

>     find-image is an autoloaded Lisp function in `image'.
>     (find-image SPECS)
>
>     Find an image, choosing one of a list of image specifications.
>
> And just _how_ is this autoloaded Lisp function going to be found when
> load-path gets pointed elsewhere?

How did you manage _not_ to load `image' with a tool bar present?

> Reiner, please don't replace one hack with an even more ugly and
> dangerous one.  I propose that toolbarx-find-image just uses its old
> method (but let us remove data-directory from toolbarx-image-path).
> Only when that fails, does it call find-image.
>
> That is reasonably clean and efficient, and it only depends on
> find-image working.

Sorry, I fail to understand what is clean about (ab)using
`locate-library' plus `create-image' instead of `find-image'.  Feel
free to revert my changes.

Bye, Reiner.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |  http://rsteib.home.pages.de/



_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel

Reply via email to