Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Ralf Angeli (2005-11-05) writes: > >> The attached patch (against CVS) will remedy some of these problems >> and do some more: > > Ahem, "... and do some more goodness" would probably be less > misleading. (c;
Well, according to some recent thread on comp.text.tex or de.comp.text.tex (don't remember which), most additions should be considered the work of the devel, anyway. Probably the patch would have been more appropriate on auctex-devel. Redirecting there. I think the functionality is probably a step in the right direction with regard to what the user wants. But we need to fold the error processing of preview-latex and AUCTeX at one point of time. It would also be nice if errors from AUCTeX could be flagged right in the text in some manner, and preview-latex runs could make use of that: right now preview-latex ignores TeX errors altogether. If it detected them, it could, for example, refrain from showing previews in the closed form. Some errors result in one-pixel images (like when math groups get confused), and people wonder where their stuff went. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
