* David Kastrup (2005-11-19) writes: > Ivan Savov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I just pulled the latest XEmacs and the MinGW stuff in order to >> setup preview-latex which seems like the coolest thing since sliced >> bread.
Installation of preview-latex for XEmacs in AUCTeX 11.81 is botched. >> ./configure --with-xemacs='C:\Program Files\XEmacs\XEmacs-21.4.13\i586-pc-win >> 32\xemacs' --with-texmf-dir='E:/localtexmf' --with-packagedir='C:\Program >> Fil >> es\XEmacs\xemacs-packages' Installing in xemacs-packages does not sound like a good idea because that place is the home of packages provided through XEmacs repositories. The installation routine of AUCTeX will try to install into site-packages which is a better place. > Ok, this is maximum Windows terror level for the scripts: file names > with back slashes and blanks in them. The scripts are intended to > deal with that, but I think we had some recent fixes in that area > since 11.81. Ralf? I fixed the handling of the path to the tex executable but that's unrelated ... >> for x in ; do \ >> echo ' /bin/install -c -m 644' $x 'C:\\Program\ >> Files\\XEmacs\\xemacs-packages/lisp/auctex' ; \ >> /bin/install -c -m 644 $x C:\\Program\ >> Files\\XEmacs\\xemacs-packages/lisp/auctex ; \ >> done; >> /bin/sh: -c: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `;' >> /bin/sh: -c: line 1: `for x in ; do echo ' /bin/install -c -m 644' $x ... What we are seeing here looks rather like something Jan-Åke fixed some time ago. See <URL:http://mid.gmane.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Ivan, can you check if the installation works with a snapshot from <URL:http://theotp1.physik.uni-ulm.de/~ste/comp/emacs/auctex/snapshots/>? -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
