* David Kastrup (2005-11-30) writes: > Maybe a sequence > " > "` > "" > "`" > """ > ?
Yeah, but this is only sensible if " is an active character. ``" does not make much sense. For this to work we'd have to keep track which babel options make " active. In addition a sequence like " "` "`" "" """ would probably be less surprising because it does not flip from "` to "" and back to "`. But I still like your suggestion more because I consider "" to be needed more frequently than "`". With respect to the above thoughts I am a bit reluctant to change quote after quote insertion further. What we have now is better than before in my opinion and the above sequences are somewhat insane. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
