* David Kastrup (2006-02-05) writes: > after some Usenet discussions I noticed that we still have a default > value of `nil' for LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators. I found that > somewhat surprising. > > I particular since we have tex-fold and preview-latex functionality > available by default,
Folding is not really affected by overfull lines because a linebreak is inserted into the overlay if the line became overfull. (In case of Emacs, that is. XEmacs is a different story.) > I think we should at least enable the open-brace > and opening-math functionality by default. I dislike my text being formatted like this. In addition activating `LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators' adds some overhead to filling which may be a problem when filling whole files. I haven't profiled this, however. > I seemed to remember we had converged on something like this, and so I > was a bit surprised to see the default value of nil. > > Any input? What do persons who are using filling often and are aware > of that option tend to use? nil -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
