* David Kastrup (2006-02-06) writes: > Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> * Reiner Steib (2006-02-06) writes: >>> >>> Maybe a variable `TeX-confirm-clean' with values like nil (don't >>> ask), t (ask for every file) >> >> This would annoy the hell out of me. (c: Do you think that anybody >> would actually use this option? In my opinion such a behavior would >> only be asked for in very special situations which means it's probably >> not worth the hassle implementing it. > > Prefix-argument?
In the design we are currently discussing that's already taken for enabling the deletion of output files in addition to intermediate files. But you are right that the behavior of asking a question for every file is a good candidate for case-by-case activation via a prefix argument. >>> and 'once (ask only once for each call of >>> TeX-clean; maybe combined a listing of the files) should be added. >> >> Yep. > > Well, one can see how "x" in dired asks for confirmation. Yes, that's what I was thinking about. (Funny, I had to check what `x' actually does in dired. I usually use `m' and `D'.) -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
