* David Kastrup (2006-04-19) writes: > It is sort of annoying that > > %<trace> some TeX code > > is recognized as a "tag" by font highlighting in docTeX mode, but will > get ripped into pieces by TAB or M-q. > > Would it be possible to get reasonable treatment for ^%<[^>\n]+> or > something like that as a comment prefix?
Does that mean the tag should be prepended to following lines if a long line gets broken, i.e. should something like %<tag> some long long long long long long long long long long long long text become %<tag> some long long long long long long long long long long long %<tag> long text after typing `M-q' with point in the line? Or must such a line not be broken at all? What about indentation? Should <TAB> be a nop on such a line or only indent stuff behind the tag? -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
