On Sat, May 27 2006, David Kastrup wrote: > Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Thu, May 25 2006, David Kastrup wrote: >>> a) RPMs >>> b) XEmacs packaging >>> c) functionality in Emacs 21.4, CVS, XEmacs-whatever >> >> I could probably can look at a), b) and do a little Emacs 21 testing¹ >> within the next week. > > In that case, I think it a good idea to delay the release a few more > days. It saves us trouble if we can tell people that the RPMs can be > built straight from the spec in the tarball.
Done. I could build (SUSE 9.2) and install (SUSE 9.2, 10.0) the RPM successfully. AUCTeX (incl. preview-latex) are correctly activated. I didn't do much testing. Maybe tomorrow^Wlater today. > And it is also a good thing if we can announce RPM and XEmacs > package availability and download locations simultaneously with the > release. The xemacs-package also builds successfully. I didn't try to install it. XEmacs users might want to test the package from my snapshot directory: http://theotp1.physik.uni-ulm.de/~ste/comp/emacs/auctex/snapshots/ > And similarly with the precompiled Emacs for Windows. So when the > thing tests out satisfactorily and packages satisfactorily sometime > next week, then I'd suggest tagging it. People then rebuild and > upload the various packages under their subvision, and hen > everything has been uploaded, the announcements will go out. > > Sounds like a reasonable plan? Yes. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/ _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
