* David Kastrup (2006-06-04) writes: > Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'd move the directory deletion and recreation to a separate >> cleaning target and abort the tarball creation if the directory is >> not empty. For the sake of stupid people like myself. > > If you think this really, really, really, really necessary, go ahead.
No, it's not _that_ important. > Frankly, I don't see the point, and I found the old behavior quite > convenient. I often have to do dozens of repetitions until I finally > get a release right and all rpms and packages have built properly and > I verified them to be basically ok and working (there is a reason that > upload itself is not part of the build targets). Having to use an > explicit cleaning target every time is going to be quite a nuisance. Ever used the history mechanism of bash? > And once you actually _have_ something uploaded (and that is the point > at which it starts to make sense to retain stuff, since only then the > file names are permanently associated with particular content), you > can always get it back from the site you uploaded it to. Except for the directive files. The significance of which is quite limited apart from the upload process, I know. As this is a minor issue of little importance I'll stop arguing now and leave the code alone. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
