Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jun 05 2006, Reiner Steib wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 05 2006, David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> Apropos RELEASE file: I still want to mention there that we have >>> RPMs and XEmacs package available. Reiner, what RPMs will we >>> exactly provide? >> >> auctex-emacs-11.83-0.suse.noarch.rpm >> auctex-11.83-0.suse.src.rpm >> >>> And it is expected that the "Suse" source RPM will build fine on >>> Fedora, right? As would the tarball, right? >> >> Probably. But I don't have access to a Fedora system (I'm unable to >> login to sourceforge's compile farm anymore) so I can't verify. > > I noticed that shell.sourceforge runs FC 2. I was able to build > src.rpm and .rpm there (with test-11.83 files from yesterday, but that > shouldn't matter): > > $ rpmbuild --rebuild *.suse.src.rpm > -> auctex-emacs-11.83-0.fedora.noarch.rpm > > $ rpmbuild -ta auctex-11.83.tar.gz > -> auctex-emacs-11.83-0.fedora.noarch.rpm > -> auctex-11.83-0.fedora.src.rpm
The numbers are "0" because this is not yet the final build, right? > As I ain't root there, I can't install, but "rpm --test -i ..." > doesn't give errors. > > If we decided to offer these on gnu.org as well, I could use "rpm > --resign" to add a signature, but I don't want to upload my gnupg > secring to sourceforge to use "rpmbuild --sign ...". Definitely. Uh, uhm. This is somewhat embarrassing, but I should have a Fedora partition on my hard disk, something between Core 2 and Core 4 (don't remember exactly, and it was rawhide for a while). It should be good for testing this as well as how graceful the installation deals with previous versions of AUCTeX/preview-latex. I never booted the partition on my current system, so I can't vouch that it will really work. But if you mail me a signed rpm, I could give it a try. If the stuff builds on a bonafide Fedora system, I'd prefer to have the stuff built there, though, since I have no idea what version would correspond to my partition. But for testing, my setup should be good enough. Send me a signed rpm or alternatively, a signed mail containing the rpm by mail, and I'll give it a try. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
