Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * David Kastrup (2006-07-15) writes: > >> It would not be irrelevant since it still has to evaluate add-hook >> without bombing out. But if you checked, then that's ok. I >> thought I remembered we had some problem in that area, but maybe >> XEmacs has made progress since then, and maybe it was just >> add-to-list which had the problem I remembered. > > XEmacs 21.4.19 on my Debian system at least supports the 4th > argument. As far as I understand the doc string it doesn't make the > hook local on its own, however. An interface typical for XEmacs, > I'd say.
Can be used for doing everything, but it is hard figuring out how to let it do the subset that actually would make sense? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
