On Wed, Oct 18 2006, David Kastrup wrote:
> Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is it still necessary to have it compiled with XEmacs 21.4 after
>> this change?
>
> Well, if the change works (I did not test it!), the answer depends
> mainly on whether the byte-code of 21.5 can be expected to be
> compatible to 21.4.
>
>> Given my past experience with XEmacs builds and the frightening
>> `system-configuration-options'[1] in SUSE's XEmacs, compiling a
>> suitable XEmacs 21.4 is something I'd like to avoid. I'm not sure
>> which features are required for AUCTeX/preview-latex. MULE? Image
>> formats?
>
> For compiling, MULE would likely be required for the Japanese style
> support.
>
> Anyway, could you check whether the functions people have complained
> about are actually defined in your version of XEmacs 21.5?
,----
| ELISP> emacs-version
| "21.5 (beta21) \"corn\" (+CVS-20050720) XEmacs Lucid"
| ELISP> (fboundp 'display-pixel-width)
| t
| ELISP> (fboundp 'previous-single-char-property-change)
| t
`----
Christophe, you wrote that preview works fine on your laptop
(cygwin+xemacs+auctex). Did you use the same AUCTeX XEmacs package as
on the Fedora machine? Which XEmacs version is it?
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
