* David Kastrup (2006-11-21) writes: >>> Correct. Apart from that, it is very inconvenient to type, anyway. >>> We have not yet been able to agree on a good alternative. Maybe we >>> should just leave this to next-error and be done. >> >> That would be better. > > Well, except that AUCTeX does not get used only on Emacs 22 (which has > a binding for `next-error'). I tend to forget that.
AUCTeX already maps the binding of `next-error' both on Emacs and on XEmacs to `TeX-next-error'. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
