Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Carsten Dominik (2006-12-21) writes: > >> On Dec 21, 2006, at 18:54, Ralf Angeli wrote: >> >>> Is there a CVS repository besides the one of Emacs where it would be >>> worthwhile to have the history preserved? >> >> No. I did have the files under CVS, but I have been not systematic >> about it and used CVS mainly as a backup mechanism. So the changes >> annotations are not so useful, I don't think it makes sense to keep >> this. > > I just downloaded > <URL:http://staff.science.uva.nl/~dominik/Tools/reftex/reftex-alpha.tar.gz>. > Is that the current distribution and does it contain all files > available? No additional stuff for something like autoconf et al.? > > In that case I'd just go ahead and import that into AUCTeX's CVS > repository as is and then we can start hacking on it. > > I guess for importing something like > cvs -z3 -d:ext:<membername>@cvs.savannah.nongnu.org:/sources/auctex \ > import -m "Import of RefTeX 4.31" reftex FSF REFTEX_4_31 > should work. I'm not sure about vendor and release tag. For the > release tag perhaps the format we are using for AUCTeX would be > better: release_4_31.
I am not sure that importing is the right thing to do. If I understand the CVS docs correctly, this produces a branch, but we'd rather want to have this added into HEAD. Does anybody have a clue who we could ask about this? With regard to releases: using the same kind of tags as for the rest of AUCTeX seems like a plan, but we should keep RefTeX out of the AUCTeX _distribution_ (tarballs, top Makefile etc) at first, I would think, even though we'll have it be a top-level subdirectory. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
