* David Kastrup (2007-01-06) writes: > Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> * David Kastrup (2007-01-06) writes: >> >>> Further discussion to auctex-devel. We will need to ask some savannah >>> hacker to make a copy of the Emacs CVS into an AUCTeX module, and then >>> we'll need to check in the additional files from Carsten. >> >> If merging is so easy with Arch as everybody says, we should use it >> instead of CVS. > > I think people use Arch for merging, but still work on CVS > repositories as the end points.
Michael seems to work only with Arch for ERC development. > The main point of wanting RefTeX in the AUCTeX repository was to have > AUCTeX developers work on it. I doubt that a different version > control system would be the path to that. Many people are complaining about the shortcomings of CVS. And Arch seems to be more flexible in many ways. So I think using Arch will rather have a positive effect on the motivation of people working with a version-controlled RefTeX. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
