Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * David Kastrup (2007-01-27) writes: > >> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Changes compared to the currently downloadable tarball are the >>> addition of a ChangeLog file, the placement of reftex.texi into a >>> `doc' directory and the removal of the `reftex' info file. >> >> Sounds reasonable. With regard to Makefile, one will probably at >> one point of time take a look of whether it makes sense to do >> something using autoconf, but maybe that's a can of worms. > > Speaking about cans of worms ... How about trying to implement a > Lisp-based build procedure for RefTeX? Here we have the chance to > start more or less from scratch.
It's not like we would not have this option with AUCTeX if we really wanted to. > That would also spare us complaints of users having to download and > install build tools separately. A valid point on Windows. IIRC, Miles posted some installer tool written in Elisp on emacs-devel, something to which Richard said "if a package system would look like that, I would not object to it". Something left to for after the release IIRC. It would probably make a lot of sense, if we wanted to go the route of Elisp-based installation, to start there. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
