* David Kastrup (2007-01-27) writes: > Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> We could also consider putting the Lisp files into their own `lisp' >> directory. > > Also sounds reasonable. Seems consistent with a separate doc > directory. Of course, this might buy us additional Makefiles. At the > current point of time, I have absolutely no idea what kind of changes > could trouble what kind of users.
Okay, here is an updated proposal: reftex/CHANGES reftex/COPYING reftex/ChangeLog reftex/INSTALL reftex/Makefile reftex/README reftex/lisp/Makefile reftex/lisp/lpath.el reftex/lisp/reftex-auc.el reftex/lisp/reftex-cite.el reftex/lisp/reftex-dcr.el reftex/lisp/reftex-global.el reftex/lisp/reftex-index.el reftex/lisp/reftex-parse.el reftex/lisp/reftex-ref.el reftex/lisp/reftex-sel.el reftex/lisp/reftex-toc.el reftex/lisp/reftex-vars.el reftex/lisp/reftex.el reftex/doc/Makefile reftex/doc/reftex.texi The Lisp files got their own directory and I've tentatively listed Makefile files in subdirectories. If everybody agrees on that I can ask the Savannah admins to set up the `reftex' module and copy over RefTeX files from the Emacs repository including the change history. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
