Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I disagree here. There is a difference to add > (require 'tex-site) or > the like to a .emacs file > > than to try to install even a complied Xemacs package which you > offer. I presume we simply are thinking of different users here. > Especially users of the MS Windows environment are not used to > unpack packages in some directories they don't know. Believe me > there are a lot of users still using (La)TeX but they are not > hackers at all.
Unless I am mistaken, the main point of the package system was to make it possible for non-hackers to manage the installation of XEmacs packages. If you say that this fails to be the case, it should be fixed. > Anyhow I don't want to start a flamewar on this but to start to > synchronise. Let us hope the best (any help would be appreciate as > always.) When you find yourself stuck, ask on emacs-devel. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
