* Masayuki Ataka (2007-02-13) writes: > # Which timing do you want to integrate tex-symb.el into AUCTeX? > # Before AUCTeX 11.85? After you rewrite TeX math codes?
Yes, when TeX Math mode will be done would be a good time. I'm currently working on it and will hopefully be able to present something in course of next week. I'll be travelling the coming days including the weekend, so I don't know if I'll have time to work on the mode till the beginning of next week. > Uh, the complicated code let tex-fold not fold macros if the > macro is [not] defined in tex-fold-math-spec-list, because function > tex-fold-math folds macro `\foo' that have no corresponding > symbol, to [foo]. > > Maybe, we should add optional argument to tex-fold-math for > ignoring folding macros iff the corrsponding symbol is not > defined. Yes. Or we use a variable which can be let-bound during execution of `TeX-fold-item'. I'm not sure what the better solution would be. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
