David Kastrup writes: > _After_ looking up the XEmacs history. You conveniently forget this > little detail time and again. [...] > Which was becoming plausible just after checking the XEmacs history. > Which you conveniently forgot.
I don't know when Ralf did the checking, but the posting order seems to be the reverse, by about 8 hours. Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I should hope we could do better than that, but I am afraid that you > are able to convinve me otherwise time and again. In the light of the above, it seems much of the convincing takes place in the privacy of your own skull. The mistake about the timing is surely an "honest" mistake, but to make such a defamatory statement *twice* without checking (a curious omission, given the frequency with which you demand message-ids from me) clearly demonstrates your conviction of impregnable righteousness. I take my leave of this thread. _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
