Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2008-05-03) writes:
>
>> Or we could allow environment specifications like frame,itemize and they
>> would enter nested environments in the first place. The last is
>> probably most powerful, but will not be easily discovered by the average
>> user even when the prompt asks for "environment(s):"
>
> Just to be sure I understand this correctly. When entering
> "frame,itemize" you'd like that to become
>
> \begin{frame}
> \frametitle{foo}
> \begin{itemize}
> \item
> \end{itemize}
> \end{frame}
>
> ?
>
> Is this really a common use case?
In beamer, yes. But I think that this particular interface is too much
of a poweruser one (and I don't know whether there is a completion
function for comma-separated lists right now) to solve the problem for
everyone.
But I think it is quite common to have a different environment on the
outer level and the same type of environment further inside repeatedly.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
