>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hello David,
> Directed to both XEmacs and AUCTeX developer lists. > It has become clear in the last few years that the efforts of > AUCTeX developers to support XEmacs are basically a waste of time. > According to the XEmacs developer lists, there is no noticeable > interest in an uptodate AUCTeX distribution. Well, first of all I have to apologize for not having been able to submit the desired patch in due time. However thanks to Mats Lidell we have an almost working solution (save a patch which should be applied to XEmacs.rules). It is however not clear right now, whether this patch will be accepted or another solution should be found. In any case I will submit that patch tomorrow, (my workload has been high in the past months) and hopefully within a couple of days we will have a working solution. Once that is settled further synchronization should be easy (given that the Installation process will not be changed again). I all the time have benefit from your generous support of XEmacs and appreciate that a lot. It is true there was no real Xemacs hacker (save Nick for a time) actively contribution code to auctex. The best I could offer myself would be testing, some contributions to style files but unfortunately not more. > Am I overlooking something? So given that we will have a working solution soon I would like to ask you, not to stop the support you have given so far to XEmacs. Thank you very much Uwe Brauer _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
