Hi Ralf,
On 2008-02-06 06:15 +0800, Ralf Angeli wrote:
> My biggest fear at the moment is that the notation for specifying syntax
> alternatives is not flexible or intuitive enough. This is currently
> done with a prefix notation. So for example "|{\" means that the next
> token could either be a TeX group ("{") or a macro ("\"). There is
> currently only support for two alternatives. If we wanted to allow more
> than two this might become ugly, i.e. with the example above one would
> have to write "|{|\_" meaning "{ or \ or _".
I came across this post while I was trying to figure out what is syntax
spec in `font-latex-add-keywords'. I also did search of that function as
well as "syntax" in the AUCTeX manual with no avail.
`font-latex-add-keywords' is not documented but is extensively used in
style files. It seems `font-latex-user-keyword-classes' and
`font-latex-built-in-keyword-classes' partially explain what syntax spec
is. But in some style files such as beamer.el, "<" is also used. Does
that mean one can supply any char as syntax spec?
(font-latex-add-keywords '(("frametitle" "<[{")) 'slide-title)
I am new to AUCTeX although I am trying to be fairly familiar with it so
that I can easily create styles for my LaTeX editting.
Thanks again for making AUCTeX better and better.
Best wishes,
--
.: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: I use Emacs :.
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
