On Mar 6, 2013, at 5:11 AM, Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> wrote: > Mads Jensen <[email protected]> writes: > > Hi Mads, > >> Xindy is an alternative command to generate indexes. It supports a >> lisp syntax-like language for specifying how to format entries, e.g., >> whether to use number ranges, and how to sort entries etc. Xindy is a >> program for handling indexing for multiple formats, including >> TeX/LaTeX for which purpose there's texindy. >> >> I just added an entry to TeX-command-list, as the program uses the >> same output from LaTeX, but you can specify some extra switches, e.g., >> one for handling German, and which style file to use (if not using the >> default). > > Thanks, committed. > >> It's merely a suggestion, but shouldn't there be a tool button for the >> index command? > > I don't know. I think it's much less frequently used than the > button-enabled LaTeX, View, BibTeX, and Spell commands, and there's not > too much space for buttons anyway. (And basically, nobody uses Emacs > with a tool-bar anyway. :-)) > > At least with the GTK tool-bar, if there are more buttons than there's > space, you get a > symbol you can press to see the others. But I'm not > sure if that's supported in a similar good way by Xaw, Athena, or > whatever toolkit people build emacs with. So as long as nobody checks > that, I'd prefer not to overload the tool-bar.
FWIW, you get the > symbol on OS X with the "NextStep" toolkit. I have no opinion about adding more buttons. -Ivan _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
