Thanks Tassilo. On 2013-04-04 15:27 +0800, Tassilo Horn wrote: >> [1. text/x-patch; >> 0001-Fix-a-bug-in-LaTeX-outline-level-for-customised-outl.patch] > > Could you please provide some insights to when this patch makes a > difference?
It is all very vague for me. But http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.auctex.bugs/1648 seems to say something about the current behaviour for example if outline-regexp is customised, org-narrow-to-subtree would not work. >> [3. text/x-patch; 0003-Fix-a-bug-causing-Invalid-face-reference-quote.patch] > > When do you get the invalid face reference? I've tried setting > > (setq font-latex-user-keyword-classes > '(("shadow-hidden" (("hide" "{")) > '((((class color) (min-colors 88) (background light)) > :background "darkseagreen2") > (((class color) (min-colors 88) (background dark)) > :background "darkolivegreen") > (((class color) (min-colors 16) (background light)) > :background "darkseagreen2") > (((class color) (min-colors 16) (background dark)) > :background "darkolivegreen") > (((class color) (min-colors 8)) > :background "green" :foreground "black") > (t :inverse-video t)) command) > ("shadow-mycomment" (("mycomment" "{")) shadow command) > ("shadow-comment" (("comment" "{")) shadow command))) > > so that I both specify a face using a face specification and using its > name, but I don't see any difference (nor errors) with or without your > patch. I have a recipe here to reproduce the bug: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.auctex.devel/2466 HTH, Leo _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
