David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: >>> That leaves at least a tangible impression of who looked over the >>> patch in case the question "who was ok with this ever being pushed >>> in this state" arrives >> >> Can I read out of that statement that you are not satisfied with the >> state of the patch? > > No, I haven't looked at it at all. This was just explaining the > procedure.
Ok, yes, now I understand the procedure and its rationale, and in the future I'm going to sign off patches I'm committing for others after review. Thanks, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
