On 2013-11-04 18:00, [email protected] wrote: > Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> writes: >> > Well, my argument is that if we add completion for macros that are >> > seldomly used, then completion doesn't serve discoverability anymore. > That should not be a criterion for being less helpful. It might be an > argument to divide stuff into two classes, like file completion does: > you can still complete on ignored files if your prefix rules out any > non-ignored file.
I like the idea about having some variable to discard some macros from the completion. >> > Just one more macro, no. But if we add the missing, less frequently >> > used macros, so that every style is complete, then my discoverability >> > argument makes sense, no? > See above. Does somebody want to commit my patch? I'm not really sure if an average user will ever use \DeclareGraphicsRule, so somebody makes the executive decision. -- Med Venlig Hilsen / Kind Regards, Mads Jensen If I find in myself desires which nothing in this world can satisfy, the only logical explanation is that I was made for another world. -- C.S. Lewis
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
