>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> writes: > Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Mosè,
>> >> My idea is as follows: >> - convert `TeX-source-correlate-method-active' into a function; >> - leave `TeX-source-correlate-determine-method' as it is now, at least >> I don't think it will be necessary to change it as I proposed last >> year; >> - add the alist above to the possible values of `TeX-source-correlate-method'; >> - adapt `TeX-source-correlate-mode'. >> >> But a patch is worth a thousand words, see the one attached. >> >> I believe a safe default for `TeX-source-correlate-method' would be >> '((dvi . source-specials) (pdf . synctex)) >> which is compatible with most viewers, instead of the current 'auto. While I perfectly understand you former patch, I right now do not see the advantage for your new approach. Besides, are you sure it does not break backwards-compatibility??? Another even more important issue: different OS. I never really have used LateX on windows so I can't say anything. Recently I had to deal with a Mac, OS Lion with MacPorts. This is almost a linux-like environment (there is texlive and okular, which right now does not work for me and evince (and of course xpdf, but this seems not appropriate for forward+inverse search). So it boils down to this: which configuration (viewer) should be used for Mac? regards Uwe
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
