Hi Ikumi, 2014-07-14 17:01 GMT+02:00 Ikumi Keita <[email protected]>: >>> In addition, xemacs does not seem to accept 'min-colors' in the defface. >>> Xemacs reports the following warnings in the *Warnings* buffer when >>> opening an ordinary latex file. > > ... > >> I can reproduce this in XEmacs too. Do you mean that this doesn't >> happen with Emacs 21.4? Is "*TeX Help*" buffer colored as it should >> be in Emacs >= 22? Since `propertize' doesn't seem to have effect in >> XEmacs, I'm thinking about setting `TeX-error-description-*' faces to >> nil there, but I need to know whether we should do the same in Emacs >> 21 or not. > > Just opening a latex file did not raise warnings, so I thought emacs > 21.4 was OK. However, that turned out to be false. After opening the > circ.tex in preview-latex, C-x 5 2 signals an error "Unknown req > `min-colors' with options `(16)'". So it's pretty sure that emacs 21.4 > does not accept min-colors in defface, too.
Ok, I'll set those faces to nil then. One will anyway able to select a custom color, if `propertize' works (and it doesn''t work for me even with default faces in XEmacs 21.4). > And, bad news again. > > As the subject of this mail tells, emacs 21.4 and xemacs can not run > LaTeX with C-c C-c. Opening the circ.tex and typing C-c C-c RET leads > to an error "Symbol's value as variable is void: > TeX-error-overview-frame". Uh, strange, I'll check it out with XEmacs, but I'm sure this doesn't rise errors with Emacs 22 and 23, just tested. > Anyway, at last I become able to check whether my enhancements to > array-like environments work with emacs 21.4 and xemacs, and they seem > to work flawlessly. So I'll work on the issues you suggested in another > mail. Could you explain what you mean by "a test suite for this feature" > more precisely? Since a few months ago, we have a test suite under the tests/ directory, see also http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/auctex.git/tree/tests/latex This allows developers to verify whether a commit broke a feature for which a test suite has been set up. Adding a test suite for your feature isn't mandatory, but it could helpful as the only current test is also about tables. If you feel like writing a test to check parsing of the table specifications, do it, that's all ;-) Bye, Mosè _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
