>>>>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> writes:
> Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: > Hi! > I guess he asks if the release tarball for 11.87 corresponds to the > current ELPA release 11.87.5. Precisely. > The answer is no. The ELPA version is more current with several > fixes that the 11.87 still has (but it's still nearer to 11.87 than > to the Git HEAD). The reason is that it's trivial to roll a new > ELPA release while regular releases require much more effort. Oh this is not good. What are the differences? For example is Moses excellent patch concerning inverse-forward search in git head and/or ELPA? > So at the current point in time, I'd recommend to either use the Git > HEAD or the ELPA release. I cannot use ELPA for xemacs :'(. The reason why I am asking this, is the fact that I am now convinced that 11.87 has some important improvement over 11.84 and therefore I[1] would like to release an official version of its corresponding xemacs pkg (that is the Xemacs's more than a decade old counterpart of EPLA).[2] In order to do so, I would rather not base it on the version found on the webpage, but instead I really would like to include at least Moses patch. About the other enhancements I cannot judge since I did not try them out so I would rather stay away from the git version. Then we have floating around various version: - the official tar.gz and pkg.tar.gz on the web site. - the EPLA/GIT version (not sure I understand whether they are equal or not) - the official xemacs pkg. Is this desirable? Are there alternatives? For example to base everything on the git version? Uwe Brauer Footnotes: [1] as you maybe now I am the package manager for the Xemacs pkg [2] and it is not possible to use the pkg of auctex webpage, the official has a slightly different structure.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
